CollegehoopsNet.com About Us Contact Us Advertise Sponsors Want to Write?

---- College Basketball ----


 

     

Player Interviews

Fan Commentary

Message Boards

COLLEGEHOOPSNET.com

Player Interviews

Fan Commentary

Message Boards

www.NJhoopsnet.com

New Jersey College (D1-D3)

High School & Pro Basketball

CONFERENCES

  America East

  ACC

  Atlantic Ten

  Big East

  Big Ten
  Big Twelve

  Colonial Athletic

  Conference USA

  Ivy League

  MAAC

  NEC

  Pac-10

  Patriot League

  SEC
  WAC

OTHER TEAMS

  EAST
  CENTRAL
  WEST

DIVISION 2

DIVISION 3

COACHING

RECRUITING

LINKS

---COLLEGE

---NBA

---HOOPS/SPORTS

INTERVIEWS
---DIVISION ONE

---DIVISION TWO & THREE

COACHING

NBA Coverage

PAST POLLS

ABOUT US

CONTACT US

SITE HISTORY

ADVERTISE

STAFF

Writers Wanted

SPONSORS

MESSAGE BOARD

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Developing Players: The AAU Debate

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

By Brian McCormick

I am an Internet junkie. I read article after article and post after post on Internet boards, and I am concerned by what I have read over the last month. AAU is not the problem. Writers, coaches, experts, pundits, etc. all seem to think that AAU is an evil force plotting to prevent high school players from developing skills. This panic has escalated since the NBA Draft because NBA teams seem to like the game of Nowitski and Nash, Peja and Hedo, Kovalenko and Radmanavic more than Khalid El-Amin, Miles Simon, William Avery and other recent NCAA Champions.

I have been an AAU coach and I have been to Nationals at the youth levels. I coached against good coaches and bad coaches, just as I have at the high school, junior college and college levels. AAU is not the culprit for this perceived lack of development. After all, Lebron James is said to have NBA skills as a junior in high school and he has played with two AAU teams (though not anymore due to the NCAA’s latest restrictive ruling).

AAU (summer ball), along with camps like ABCD and Nike and to a lesser degree Five-Star, provide the opportunity for the best players from across the country to play against each other, meaning players from Los Angeles can test their skills against players from Michigan and a kid from Akron can become great friends with a kid from New York.

The problem, therefore, is not playing against competition. The problem is the amount of tournaments, the time spent traveling and the poor club coaches who do little more than put together a local/regional all-star team and let them run. With tournaments running from April through July, there is little time spent practicing. Instead of merely being the gatherers of talent, these coaches need to be teachers, teaching skills that are not taught by high school coaches. With a collection of all-star players, coaches can teach skills and concepts that may not be pertinent or relevant to a high school team where there may be only one really good player and a number of average players. This high school coach would face many more challenges than teaching the all-star player some fine points on his game. In many high school programs, coaches do not have the resources, either the knowledge and capability or the needed assistants, to truly spend time with the one gifted player to make minor adjustments on his game. Instead, the coach is forced to ignore the needs of the exceptional in order to meet the needs of the typical. This would be like forcing gifted students to take regular courses as opposed to challenging them with honors and AP courses. Would students who excel in AP courses receive any benefit from a school system devoid of the honors curriculum? For gifted basketball players, their honors courses are playing for the best club teams and attending the star-studded camps. But, just because they are talented, should coaches fail to challenge them in these advanced settings?

In soccer, many players turn their back on high school soccer because it fails to do anything positive for their game. They develop bad habits and play against sub-par competition. They stick to club soccer where the coaches teach more, skills are developed and the competition is greater. Why don’t club basketball coaches approach their teams in the same manner? Club coaches are lucky; they do not have the undedicated players or the marginally skilled players: they have the cream of the crop, the best of the best and a real opportunity to work with the talented and increase their skill level, which often lags behind their athleticism. I would relish the opportunity to coach a club team with ten college-bound players; not because I’m concerned with winning the Big Time Tournament or the Peach Jam, but because it would excite me as a coach to practice with these players and try and make them better than they already are: to take their game to the next level and truly prepare them for college ball, especially with an improved skill set. Players need to improve their footwork to get their shot off, as they will no longer be the most athletic player in every game. They need improved ball handling ability to handle the pressure faced at the college level; they need to be taught where and how to move without the ball, to create space and find an opening to be a scoring threat. They need better footwork in the post to be able to battle against players equally athletic and just as big. It is in these “honors” classes, the practices and workouts with the best club programs, where these elite players really have the chance to develop. However, in many cases, this opportunity is squandered.

Basically the question becomes: Do players play on club teams to gain exposure and get a scholarship, or do they play to develop skills and compete against the best players in the nation? My contention is that it should be possible to do both. By concentrating efforts on selected tournaments instead of trying to play in every tournament possible from April to June, coaches can work with teams and improve the individual skills, the shooting, the ball handling, the passing, the defense, the decision-making, movement without the ball, etc that the players must learn to be successful at the next level. As long as coaches merely roll the ball out and let the talented rely on their innate talent, they are acting more as a babysitter/travel agent than they are as a coach. Why can’t these elite programs find coaches who can coach, who can develop and refine skills and prepare players for the next level? I am sure there are those select programs out there that do; but, if so, they get far less publicity than the ones who don’t. I think the emphasis in summer ball should be on preparation, development and competition, not on simply compiling the most well known players or winning an otherwise meaningless summer tournament.

Writer Brian McCormick coaches professionally in Europe and runs the High Five Hoop School and Hard 2 Guard Camp in Sacramento, CA. He is a frequent contributor to basketball coaching magazines, and his first book, The Art of Ball Handling: Get a Handle on Your Game, will be available in the coming weeks at www.basketballsense.com.

 
 

 

 

 
       
 

---- COLLEGE BASKETBALL ----

CollegehoopsNet.com About Us Contact Us Sponsors Advertise Want to Write?