college basketball

 

 

  College Basketball  NBA Draft  Recruiting  Preview  The Review  Store

  Email Page | Print Page |

 

college basketball tickets

 ▪ College Basketball Tickets - 200% Guarantee

 ▪ Get Your Final Four Tickets Here!

 

 

NAVIGATION

Ranking & Predictions

Division Two & Three

Awards / Features

Marketplace

Message Board

Coaching Resources

Fantasy Basketball

Basketball History

CHN INFORMATION

 ▪ About CHN

 ▪ Write for CHN

 ▪ Advertising

 ▪ Links

Site Map

Teams List

VISIT OUR SPONSOR

NCAA TOURNAMENT

NCAA Tournament | Message Board | Logos & Mascots

By Raphielle Johnson

ralphieralph@netscape.net

March 12th, 2006

 

Biggest Selection Sunday Controversies

 

Ah, Selection Sunday. It can be the best of times, and it can also be the worst depending on what a team’s situation is. Are you fighting for a top seed, a smaller school awaiting your name being called, or a bubble team on pins and needles hoping that the committee picks you? We all know the myriad of emotions that come with this day, but it’s the overwhelming excitement that the college basketball season is reaching its apex. Yet for all the excitement, there’s also the pain of not hearing your school’s name called, and the anger of receiving a seed lower than you anticipated, and the shock of being sent to a locale different than the one you felt your team deserved. Undoubtedly, some past Selection Sunday “issues” will be left out, but here are some of the more intriguing controversies of the last ten years.

 

1996: Kentucky and Massachusetts are placed on the same side of the bracket.

 

Going into the Tournament, the two best teams in America were Kentucky, with their deep roster of talent, and UMass, with National Player of the Year Marcus Camby. Perfect recipe for a Monday night title game, right? Wrong. Somehow the two best teams ended up on the same side of the bracket, setting up a much-anticipated semifinal…and an anticlimactic final. Kentucky got a measure of revenge from their early season meeting, and went on to defeat Syracuse 76-67 for the title.

 

1997: The possibility of a North Carolina/ Indiana matchup in the second round.

 

The selection committee has always said that they don’t set up brackets for television, and that CBS executive aren’t in their ear. But the skeptics had a field day with this one. Dean Smith, looking to break Adolph Rupp’s all-time wins (Division I) record and having to beat Bobby Knight to do it? Too good to be true. Well, Fairfield gave the Tar Heels all they wanted and then some in the first round, and the Hoosiers were unceremoniously bounced by Colorado. Coach Smith, two days later, got the record by beating the less ratings-sexy Buffaloes.

 

1998: Florida State gets in with a 6-10 record in the ACC.

 

Talk about your eye-openers. Yes the ACC is traditionally one of the best conferences in the country, but how do you justify selecting a team that finished the regular season with ten conference losses? You say that they played a very tough schedule outside of the league. Helped by this and a strong RPI, the Seminoles found themselves in the NCAA Tournament. And despite the outrage, the ‘Noles knocked off fifth-seeded TCU in the first round. Valparaiso sent FSU home in the second round in the always interesting 12 vs. 13 matchup.

 

1999: Despite an RPI of 74, New Mexico gets into the NCAA Tournament.

Rarely do you have a team with a record of 23-8 be questioned about whether or not the deserve an at-large bid. But when you have a strength of schedule of 157 (nonconference SOS: 240), and a record of 12-1 against teams ranked 201 or higher in the RPI, a red flag is raised. However, the Lobos were able to make it to the WAC Conference final, where they lost to a Utah team that hadn’t lost a game in conference play. UNM eventually lost in the second round to eventual national champion Connecticut.

 

2000: Cincinnati gets a two-seed.

 

The Bearcats were the team to beat heading into Championship Week, the top-ranked team in America with the nation’s best player, Kenyon Martin. But a fractured leg changed all of that. Losing Martin in the Conference USA quarterfinal against St. Louis, the Bearcats lost that game then watch in shock (and horror) as they were dropped down to the two line. Unfair? Maybe it was, but the Bearcats were clearly a different team without their best player. Tulsa proved that in knocking them out in the second round.

 

2000: Southwest Missouri State (now Missouri State) left home despite an RPI of 34.

 

The Bears are the answer to the trivia question of the team with the highest RPI to not receive a bid to the NCAA Tournament. An overall SOS of 60, and a nonconference SOS of 28, and a record of 9-1 in their last ten games. How on earth did they not get in? The Missouri Valley Conference was ranked eleventh in conference RPI, and an even worse nonconference SOS of 21st among the thirty-two leagues. This led to the demand of MVC Commissioner Doug Elgin that the member schools beef up their nonconference schedules.

 

2001: Despite a record of 18-14, Georgia gets into the Tournament.

 

This may have been one of the first examples of how it pays off to play an extremely tough schedule. Thanks to an RPI of 19, the Bulldogs received an eight seed in the South Region opposite the Missouri Tigers. What helped their cause was a 9-7 conference record in the SEC, which that year was rated the toughest conference by the RPI. Wins over Top 25 teams such as Ole Miss and Florida sealed their fate. Unfortunately, they fell 70-68 in the first round to Missouri.

 

2002: The first year of the pod system.

 

In 2002, the selection committee instituted the “pod system”, meant as a way of keeping the higher seeded teams closer to home. A good idea in terms of rewarding the schools who did what they were supposed to do throughout the year. But this did not prevent a few raised eyebrows at the fact that Pittsburgh got to play their first two games in Pittsburgh. Not on their home court mind you, but close enough for some to question how this would all work. The only true error in the system may have been Southern Illinois, and eleven seed, playing the first two rounds in Chicago against Texas Tech and Georgia, two schools who had to travel a much farther distance to the site. Yes, the Salukis made it to the Sweet Sixteen, but that was also a skilled team that could have advanced regardless of the site.

 

2002: Gonzaga gets a lower seed than they had hoped for.

 

The Bulldogs and their fans went into Selection Sunday expecting a four seed, maybe a five. But a six? This did not make for a happy bunch when head coach Mark Few was interviewed after the pairings were announced. Amidst the boos and catcalls, Few made his team’s case for a higher seed, and this set the tone for the days leading up to their game with eleven seed Wyoming. You have to wonder if this displeasure rubbed off on the players, who were shocked by the Cowboys in the opening round. The classic meeting between the Bulldogs and Arizona would have to wait one year.

 

2003: Big East gets just four teams in- much to the chagrin of Seton Hall and Boston College.

 

The feeling among many experts during the 2002-03 season was that the Big East was down. A conference record of 10-6 got Boston College and Connecticut a share of the East Division title, and Seton Hall finished with the same record in the West. But when it came time to hear their names called on Selection Sunday, Eagle (1-5 vs. RPI Top 50) and Pirate (2-7 vs. RPI Top 50) fans heard nothing. Outrage was the feeling of many within the league, including the four (Connecticut, Notre Dame, Pittsburgh, and Syracuse) that actually made the tournament. How do you make up for this? All four get to the Sweet Sixteen and one (Syracuse) wins it all.

 

2004: More pod trouble.

 

The pod system was explained as a way to reward teams in the first two rounds, not look ahead to the second weekend. For some reason, the explanation for placing Pitt in Milwaukee for the first two rounds was that if they won the Panthers would move on to East Rutherford. Small problem: the committee placed Wisconsin in their “pod” as the six seed. This made for a rather slanted “neutral” site in the second round. But to their credit, the Panthers kept their mouths shut and played the game, which they won 59-55.

 

2004: Who’s the one in East Rutherford?

 

St. Joseph’s went undefeated through the regular season, then lost in the quarterfinals of the Atlantic 10 Tournament. One loss does not a season make, unless people decide that you played in a weak league. Ignoring the tough nonconference schedule that the Hawks played, critics, most notably CBS’ Billy Packer, loudly voiced their displeasure with SJU’s one seed. The popular choice to be on the one line was Oklahoma State, who ended up being a two seed in…East Rutherford. The bracket played out just right, treating fans to a classic regional final won by the Cowboys. But by that point, any remaining critics had to acknowledge that the Hawks were worthy of their seeding.

 

2005: Washington gets a one seed.

After Wake Forest made an early exit in the ACC Tournament, many still expected the Demon Deacons to be on the one line. The selection committee had other ideas, rewarding the Washington Huskies, who had a better record vs. the RPI Top 50 than Wake Forest (8-4 to Wake’s 6-3) and a better nonconference strength of schedule (21 to 27), with the honor. The Huskies made it to the Sweet 16 before losing to eventual Final Four team Louisville (who was also upset with their seed), and the Deacons (who most pundits still picked to win the Albuquerque region) fell to seventh-seeded West Virginia in the second round. I guess there were quite a few seeding issues in Albuquerque.

 

Some information within this article courtesy of http://kenpom.com and http://www.collegerpi.com/ .

 

 

 

Discuss College Basketball in The New CHN Message Board

College Basketball Fan Shop

click to view

 CHN HEADLINES    

 

 

 

 


Collegehoops.net: Homepage | Media Kit | Write for CHN | Site Map | Privacy Policy