Dear ESPN: Please Just Show The Game
Things you will never hear a man say: (1) I'd love to watch Thelma & Louise again. (2) Mmmm... Tofu. (3) Her breasts are way too big. And (4) I can't take another minute of ESPN.
I must sadly admit that as of this past Tuesday the one about ESPN no longer applies to me.
My displeasure with that network actually commenced a few weeks ago. During overtime of ND at Louisville, ESPN put up a live "picture-in-picture" shot of Coach Rick Pitino. Yes, the folks in charge felt it necessary to superimpose the "action" of Pitino on one knee, over the game. Utterly asinine. Though not as stupid as the thought that went through my mind - that Pitino, at age 56, was subbing himself into the game.
I understand that when there's a blow-out the producers and announcers need to try to spice things up. This has led to my accumulation of enough information to write the biographies of Dick Vitale's grandkids. But we were in overtime here.
There's also the fact that ESPN perpetually showed Pitino, while ND's coach, Mike Brey, didn't get any isolated camera time. Probably because Brey's attire was inspired by seeing a maitre‘d place a sport coat on a longshoreman. Regardless, this snubbing of Mike Brey accomplished something I never thought possible - it made me feel sympathy for Notre Dame. Damn you, ESPN.
Then Tuesday came. I turned on the Marquette-Villanova match-up and I noticed that in addition to the score, the shot clock, the game clock, and the scroll bar - there was verbiage spewing across the top of my screen. ESPN apparently decided that a perpetual stream of input from fans would enhance the basketball viewing experience. It's called "Interactive Tuesday." And the following day is definitely Migraine Wednesday.
This is just too much on the screen. It reminds me of the time when the US Women's Softball team was posing for the camera. A fine looking bunch of ladies. But then the catcher tried to squeeze in. Too much. Or when Desperate Housewives shows all the hotties standing together. But then Felicity Huffman walks in. Too much. I guess I should be happy that ESPN hasn't put up a "picture-in-picture" of a computer geek submitting comments from his parent's basement.
In fact, they should change the name from Interactive Tuesday to Dork-Central Tuesday. I mean truly, the only people reading this stuff are the same people submitting it. There's no "interaction". Heck, an even better name would be Narcissistic Tuesday.
I actually gave reading it a shot, but quickly learned that submitting in English is not a requirement. It's all in some text/Internet language. My inability to crack that code led to another realization - I'm getting old. God, I hate Interactive Tuesday.
I did think that this streaming on national TV might be a good way to plug the blog. So I was going to try to enter a message about DaveBarendsCollegeHoopHumor.blogspot.com, but that seemed a little self-important. You know, more so than having a blog with my name in the title. I, therefore, tried to enlist a few friends and family members to do my dirty work. Below are some of the responses to my request:
Sean: You have a blog?
Anil: Your blog is "DaveBarendsCollegeHoopHumor.blogspot.COM"? I thought it was "ORG". That one's much better.
My Wife: Sure I'd love to. But first I have to do the laundry, take out the garbage, change the oil in your car, teach the girls how to make a jump shot, wear the pants . . .
Here's what I'd really like to see when I watch a basketball game: a basketball game. Watching the action on the court should be the thrill, not seeing your user name crawl across the screen. Imagine trying to explain to a friend how you missed James Harden's monster dunk, "Uh, yeah, I had the game on, but I was engrossed in the witticisms of MegaDufus99."
You know who is really to blame for all this - J.K. Rowling. Yup, the woman who wrote all those freakin' Harry Potter books. She's the one who got the younger generation thinking it's fun to read. (For the purpose of this argument, please try to forget that you are currently reading.) Granted there's a place for reading, but it's not on top of a basketball game - it's in the bathroom.
I honestly fear what ESPN is going to do next. I envision that every time a player touches the ball, ESPN is going to have his personal Facebook page pop up. Or even worse, instead of that stream of stupidity, they are going to have an instant message board appear on your screen - making you feel compelled to respond. I remember back when I had AOL, my mother would perpetually IM me. Worst part was I couldn't figure out how to get that thing to go off. Pretty hard to surf the Internet for, well, things guys surf the Internet for, when there's a message on the screen from your mom asking, "What are you doing right now?"
If ESPN is dead set on this Interactive Tuesday, I do have some better ideas:
1. Announcer reading - Instead of putting the comments on the top of the screen, have an announcer read them. You know, kind of like how stockbrokers used to rattle off the ticker tape - out loud the instant they came in. I suggest Digger Phelps. This way there'd at least be a chance he'd say something intelligent. Though at almost 70, he'd likely pass out from exhaustion. Yeah, I'd pay to see that.
2. Cameraman assistance - Have the people who are commenting help the cameramen find the good-looking women in the stands. "There's a babe 4 rows behind Duke's bench - DirtyOldMan51." Or "Stephen Curry's mom is in Row2, Seat 5 - StephenCurry'sDad".
3.Screen on ball - Install a mini-monitor on the surface of the basketball. This would allow viewers to trash talk directly to the players. I imagine the following play-by play: "Harangody has the ball and is going up for a slam. But no he's, well, he appears to be crying. I'm getting a look at the screen on the ball and, well, my best guess is Harangody's mom really does wear combat boots."
I'm betting that ESPN doesn't take any of my suggestions. And after further contemplation I'm probably okay with that. There is a positive about these people who submit comments on Interactive Tuesday - they definitely make me and my blog seem substantially less pathetic.
Take it easy,
Dave
Dave Barend's humorous take on college basketball will be appearing weekly on CHN.
Check back Monday for a set of weekly Rankings and Irrelevant Comments. If you'd like to submit your choice for the most overrated or underrated team of the week, email me at davebarend@yahoo.com by Saturday.
Comments

That 30 point game was
That 30 point game was Michigan State versus Indiana. You can thank referee Ed Hightower for calling 48 fouls and causing the game to be 2 1/2 hours long. I'm a State fan and I could barely watch it. How has Espn not figured out a way to let you switch to the game you want to watch. Why not broadcast the game on one of their 50 other stations until the first game is over?

No HD
On top of all the junk espn2 was running across the screen, they seem to never broadcast a basketball game in HD on espn2HD. So Tuesday night we ended up with the bars on the side of screen also. There was probably a square foot of actual game. At least the regular espn has most of their games in HD, but outside of Raftery and Bilas, can anyone stand to listen to the rest of the yahoos talk for two hours? (Sorry Lavin, you're not too bad either.)

ESPN production is absolutely AWFUL
I am stunned to see someone else register dislike for ESPN's recent top of the screen "interactive" comments junk. Until now, I thought I was the only viewer who objected.
When I first saw this junk, I turned off Marquette and Villanova on ESPN2 completely...and never returned. I absolutely cannot concentrate on a game when this kind of distraction is displayed (or is likely to crop up over and over throughout the broadcast). Yeah, I hated to miss the game completely, but knew that the asinine comments display would antagonize me so much that I would never enjoy the broadcast.
Speaking of ESPN distractions, I have for several years changed the display on our TV from "16x9 standard" to "4x3" format, just in order to keep the scoreboard trailer from running constantly across the screen. All of my comments are expressly directed at the Men's basketball broadcasts.
Further anti-ESPN rants:
1. Stupid camera producers who insist on trying to show a replay IMMEDIATELY after a big play (or focusing in close on the key player)...while the game is still going on...and leads to missing a score or turnover in the ensuing play. It further ticks me off that the ESPN announcers NEVER apologize for missing the subsequent play, because their camera staff are so damn stupid. Yeah, the other networks do the same stupid thing = CBS and Fox. Intelligent viewers know, beyond a doubt, when fast break teams or intense defense teams are playing that camera should NEVER break away from showing the ball in play. However, ESPN producers seem to have the intelligence level of about 5th or 8th graders, when it comes to displaying the game.
2. This rant extends to lots of broadcasters, who insist on putting the camera real closeup on a buncha fans, who whoop it up right at the camera (i.e,. the viewers), point their fingers as #1, make stupid faces...all probably in response to the camera guy inciting them to respond...because YOU'RE LIVE ON TV! It's okay to show the fans, but not if you incite them to act stupid and get up close enough to show their tonsils to the rest of the nation. For instance, showing a whole section of Dukies swaying, shouting, and otherwise being genuinely enthusiastic is fine, since their actions are a sincere display of emotion.
3. Breaking into the active play of a basketball game, to SPLIT THE SCREEN...and show the viewers one small display of the game...while ESPN presents some equivalent of "Bonus Coverage" (and a bigger picture!) of either an old play from some other game...or much worse, to show its idea of some other sport NEWS...which in fact, is almost always something already shown on Sports Center over and over earlier in the day. What really gripes me is that replay or dunk from some other game will probably be shown at halftime, on Sports Center, anyway. It's just as bad to SPLIT THE SCREEN to show a little bit of the continuing game, and another screen with a closeup of one coach or the other...as if his reaction is as important at the game itself. I say, hold whatever other "action" until a dead ball or free throw allows time to display it.
MY PREDICTION: It's just a matter of time until the marketing wizards at ESPN decide to crap up ALL 4 EDGES of the screen with totally unnecessary material. Hey, you can laugh at my prediction...UNTIL you find ads for Budweiser and whatever other advertiser, filling the right and left edges top to bottom of your screen. If you think that's outrageous, wait until ESPN (or CBS or Fox) make those ads in bright colors and blinking constantly! You read it here first!
How long will it be until I'm forced to give up on watching college basketball completely?
I couldn't agree more with
I couldn't agree more with how stupid Interactive Tuesday was and even moreso how much I hate the fact they keep airing a game when it's a blowout...........BUUUUUUUT..........you have to give credit where credit is due. Without ESPN, college basketball is nothing. In the 80's people made fun of ESPN for airing the first few rounds of the NCAA tournament and claimed that nobody would watch that. It eventually turned into a billion dollar extravaganza. If they want to experiment with some things like text messages during a game, I'm all for it. It was really annoying since I had never seen that before and I kept reading them without even wanting to. Give them credit for trying new things. I mean for cryin out loud, Digger Phelps is wearing a Bobby Knight sweater tonight so they are trying anything!
Agreed. ESPN IS college
Agreed. ESPN IS college basketball at this point.. but I still prefer to make fun of them, and give them no credit :)

I applaude your sentiment.
I applaude your sentiment. though I do find the game scores on the bottom enlightening especially if the game is a dud.
My own nit to pick with ESPN has to do with thier website and the propensity to read about two paragraphs of teaser diatribe only to find I cannot read the rest of the story because I refuse to register as an "insider" I thought reporting was about reporting? How can you comment or report anything if you don't get read?
Many times I can find the same info somewhere else for free as well.










ESPN
I hate ESPN. They aired a 30 point game to it's conclusion before catching up with a UCONN game (the local team) 4 minutes in.