NCAA Tournament: South Regions Odds/Prediction

    
March 17th, 2009
3.48
Average: 3.5 (2 votes)
Your rating: None

As we did for the conference tournaments, here are log5 odds for the NCAA tournament, which take into account team’s overall offensive & defensive efficiency. The efficiency numbers are Ken Pomeroy’s, so I don’t claim credit for them, and while the basic procedure isn’t my own, the actual tables are. Semi-home games are considered in all cases, though there aren’t a whole lot of these.

 

South Region Odds

Seed

Team

R2

S16

E8

F4

Final

Champion

1

North Carolina

97.76%

84.40%

49.72%

33.49%

20.04%

11.20%

2

Oklahoma

91.81%

53.63%

26.50%

9.73%

4.13%

1.58%

3

Syracuse

85.73%

46.34%

25.98%

10.14%

4.55%

1.85%

4

Gonzaga

91.39%

68.62%

36.84%

24.35%

14.24%

7.76%

5

Illinois

83.09%

27.39%

9.03%

3.97%

1.46%

0.48%

6

Arizona St.

73.52%

42.07%

24.51%

10.09%

4.74%

2.03%

7

Clemson

68.23%

34.68%

16.21%

5.56%

2.22%

0.79%

8

Louisiana St.

49.39%

7.49%

1.92%

0.60%

0.15%

0.03%

9

Butler

50.61%

7.83%

2.04%

0.65%

0.17%

0.04%

10

Michigan

31.77%

10.73%

3.18%

0.64%

0.19%

0.05%

11

Temple

26.48%

9.08%

3.09%

0.64%

0.16%

0.04%

12

Western Kentucky

16.91%

1.83%

0.19%

0.03%

0.00%

0.00%

13

Akron

8.61%

2.15%

0.25%

0.04%

0.01%

0.00%

14

Stephen F. Austin

14.27%

2.51%

0.46%

0.05%

0.01%

0.00%

15

Morgan St.

8.19%

0.96%

0.08%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

16

Radford

2.24%

0.28%

0.02%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

 

Thoughts:

The South is interesting because of the potential Gonzaga-North Carolina Sweet Sixteen matchup, featuring the region's top two teams. Oklahoma is the weakest two seed in the field, and don’t be surprised if a good Arizona St. team manages to put up a strong showing.

 

 

+ NCAA Tournament

2009 NCAA Tournament

All Tournament Coverage

NCAA Tournament Capsules

NIT Capsules  

NCAA Tournament Schedule

Venue Info & Tickets

Bracketology

 

 

 

Comments

Craig's picture

Only one

Gonzaga is the only team in D-1 basketball to be in the top 10 in Pomeroy's offensive and defensive efficiency ratings. That's why they are so much higher than Oklahoma and Syracuse. And those efficiency ratings do factor in strength of schedule...that's why you don't really see true mid and low majors in the Pomeroy ratings until the 40's.

Add comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • You may quote other posts using [quote] tags.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options