April 10th, 2008
by Shawn Siegel
» Tags
Duke
12% (140 votes)
Kansas
8% (91 votes)
North Carolina
48% (550 votes)
Texas
4% (46 votes)
UCLA
3% (37 votes)
UCONN
10% (112 votes)
Other
15% (168 votes)
Total votes: 1144
Latest Articles
- Mississippi State's Rick Stansbury: Head Coach Q&A
- The Starting Fives: Pac-10
- NBA: Top Preseason Rookies
- Saint Mary's Basketball Preview: #35
- Daily Conference Poll: Who Will Win the Atlantic 10?
- Clip of the Day: Eric Maynor Beats Duke
- Cheerleader of the Day: Florida International
- Big Picture: Old School OJ Mayo
- College Basketball: Top Ten Sleepers
- State of '08: Utah
Basketball Tickets
|
For all of you naysayers
For all of you naysayers about Kansas being sporadic you found out that the sporatic one(s) were North Carolina & Memphis...............All year we had to put up with the PAC 10 being called the top conference even though we spanked them good in head to head (Big 12 vs Pac 10)....I really don't think carolina is that good anyway.....match them up man on man with Kansas, no contest.
Matched up man for man,
Matched up man for man, there isn't anybody who looked good against Kansas, especially if you include all nine men. of their major rotation.
think kansas will be #1 next
think kansas will be #1 next year then?
No way........Kansas will be
No way........Kansas will be extremely lucky to get into the big dance next year.......too many losses (players)....on the other hand if Chalmers and Arthur come back and they have Sheron Collins & Aldrich that is a pretty good foursome that could probably make the Sweet sixteen........they would have a weak bench and not be deep but they would be extremely competitive in any game that Aldrich is not in foul trouble. Go Hawks!!!
No doubt now that it seems
No doubt now that it seems like Rush and Chalmers are almost certainly going pro, not to mention Arthur too.. that its simply too many losses to overcome. Big 12 should be pretty up for grabs considering the losses at ku, ksu, and potentially at texas too
Post new comment