Weekly Bracketology: Missouri, Notre Dame, Vandy Gain Bids

    
January 12th, 2010
2.76
Average: 2.8 (4 votes)
Your rating: None
Final Four 2010

Final Four 2010


The weekly Bracketology field is based on how the tourney looks "as of this moment." . In late February, I release Bracketology updates daily as the season approaches crunch time.

 

Why should you care what I have to say? In 2007 & 2008,  I was considered to have one of the Top 2 or 3 brackets amongst 53 national experts including Joe Lunardi, Gary Parrish and the like. (Admittedly my 2009 final bracket was rather weak.. not sure what happened. Can't win 'em all.)

 

Notes:

Arrows indicate movement by seed. Green indicates new to the field this week. Conference champions are not my end of season predictions, but the current RPI leader at the time of the posting (this switches to conference record once all leagues have started.)

   

ONE  

Texas

Kentucky**

Kansas**

Syracuse

 

TWO

Purdue**

Villanova

Duke**

West Virginia**

 

THREE

Michigan State

Georgetown 

Tennessee

Kansas State

 

FOUR

Wisconsin

Pittsburgh

North Carolina

Gonzaga**

 

FIVE

UCONN

Temple**

BYU

Georgia Tech

 

SIX

Baylor

Clemson

Texas A&M

Florida State

 

SEVEN

Miami

Ole Miss

New Mexico**

Northern Iowa**

 

EIGHT

Dayton

UAB**

Butler**

UNLV

 

NINE

St. Mary's

Vanderbilt

Wake Forest

Mississippi St

 

TEN

William & Mary**  

Minnesota 

Missouri

California**

 

ELEVEN

Notre Dame

Cornell** 

Oklahoma St

Virginia Tech

 

TWELVE

Rhode Island

USC

Texas Tech

Florida

 

THIRTEEN

Siena**

Western Kentucky**

Nevada**

Murray State**

 

FOURTEEN

Western Carolina**

Kent St**

Northern Colorado**

Oakland**

 

FIFTEEN

Vermont**

Radford**

UTSA**

Morgan St**

 

SIXTEEN + ONE

Army**

Long Beach St**

ETSU**

Quinnipiac** / UAPB**

 

** = Automatic Bid

 

 

League Leaders/Winners (31)

- Leaders throughout the season are merely the first place team in the standings as of the update, and not projected winners. Up until conference play begins, 1st place is given to the highest RPI team. New teams this week in green.

 

America East - Vermont

A-10 - Temple

ACC - Duke

Atlantic Sun - ETSU

Big 12 - Kansas

Big East - West Virginia

Big Sky - Northern Colorado

Big South - Radford

Big Ten - Purdue

Big West - Long Beach St

CAA - William & Mary

Conference USA - UAB

Horizon - Butler

Ivy - Cornell

MAAC - Siena

MAC - Kent St

MEAC - Morgan St

MVC - Northern Iowa

MWC - New Mexico

Northeast - Quinnipiac

Ohio Valley - Murray St

Pac-10 - California

Patriot - Army

SEC - Kentucky

Southern - Western Carolina

Southland - UTSA

SWAC - UAPB

Summit - Oakland

Sun Belt - Western Kentucky

WAC - Nevada

WCC - Gonzaga

*** = Locked Up Automatic Bid

 

Last In: Rhode Island, USC, Texas Tech, Florida

 

Last Out: Cincinnati, Washington, Louisiana Tech, Wichita St

Further Four: Ohio St, Missouri St, Memphis, Northwestern

 

Dropped Out Of Field (at-large): Cincinnati, Ohio St, Washington

 

 

Comments

Shawn Siegel's picture

NOTES

-- For now, the #1 RPI team in each league is still listed as the conference champ until more leagues have played multiple games.

-- Ohio St & Washington drop out of the field for the first time all season. Pac-10 still has 2 bids as of now, though this is more due to perceived bias that the committee would give to the 2nd team.

-- Missouri's in the field due to respect in the polls, but they're a fraud. They're 0-3 away from home against Richmond, Vandy, and Oral Roberts.

-- Florida, the last team in, has an RPI of 83, the lowest of any in the field.

-- Look out for unlisted Xavier, who has a high RPI (22) and a favorable home schedule coming up.

CHN MemberCHN Writer500+ CHN PointsUgroup Member
Anonymous's picture

Who is the fraud?

Mizzou a fraud, really?!?!?? First of all, the richmond game was in a 200 seat gym in S. Padre Island. It was a neutral site game. Neutral, like the split crowd in St. louis where Mizzou ripped Illinois 81-68. So, MU is either 1-3 non-home games or 0-2 in "away" games." Not 0-3. Mizzou did blow it vs. ORU, losing by 1 in Tulsa. led by 15 late, but missed free throws adn, of course, the crowd prayed the titans to the win. of course, ORH also beat Stanford (leading the pac 10) and New Mexico (everyone's darling just a week ago) by double digits in that same arena. MU lost to Vandy, a possession from winning at end, but that's no easy task to win at mem Gym (just ask Fla.). most important, MU's losses were more than a month ago. They started 5-3. They've won 8 straight. This is a TEAM (vs. a collection of mcDonald All-Americans), give it at least two weeks to gel. Like they have. And like they did last year. meanwhile, at home Mizzou is darn good, most recently winning vs. KState. But, also look at the 39 pt win vs. Oregon (who is now among leaders of Pac10) and 28 pt slaughter of Georgia just 10 days ago. Winning on the raod in the Big 12 isn;t easy, but Mizzou did it more than most last year, and will likley snag some this year, too.

Shawn Siegel's picture

not sure why the size of the

not sure why the size of the gym matters, still a loss.. but you're right, the 0-3 line is wrong on my part. ill change that later when i get back in.

CHN MemberCHN Writer500+ CHN PointsUgroup Member
Anonymous's picture

Tigers win Big 12 road game, break Tech home streak

re: small crowd. it was a freaky atmosphere to start the year, that's all I'm saying (that gym made the old Chaminade gym look huge). In other words, the Tigers didn't fade because of a big hostile crowd...they lost to a good team in final minutes (that was predicted-NCAA bound and beat Florida a week later).

UPDATE: And the Tigers just beat Texas Tech in Lubbock, where the Red Raiders were 10-0 (including win over then ranked Washington). So, make that 1-2 away or 2-3 away or neutral. Next up: OU in Norman.

Anonymous's picture

Mizzou a Fraud|? really? REALLY?

This isn't the Quin Snyder era anymore...let's move on and give credit where credit is due. Mike Anderson winning percentage is about .700 since he started and inherited terrible situation. Now he has them winning EVERY game at home (2nd in the nation in terms of home winning streaks) and has this "rebuilding" year off to a bang. Losing early on the road to teams that make the tournament and have knocked off other power conference opponents is not a worry. Now wins over Oregon, Illinois, Georgia, Kansas State and on the road at Texas Tech. This year will surpass expectations with another trip to the tournament with mostly a freshman and sophomore lineup and the #7 recruiting class coming in next year...Mizzou is a force again and these sites and the media will catch up to the facts soon enough. Too bad Mizzou does not have a different name, such as Villanova. Guess they will have to earn it without the appeal of some of those East Coast posers (i.e. GTown, Villanova, GTech....)

Go Mizzou!

Anonymous's picture

USC

Hi Shawn. USC has banned itself from postseason play starting this year so they can't play in the PAC 10 tourney or the NCAA tourney. Also do you think that the PAC 10 only bid will be the Post season champ?

Anonymous's picture

Big Ten

I see that you only have four big ten teams. I can see leaving Illinois out as they have had some bad non-conference losses, but I would think Ohio St. should be in at this point. Three of their five losses have been without Evan Turner (who is now back with the team). They have some decent wins over Cal on a neutral court and FSU -- and played Minnesota and Butler tough on the road and UNC close at MSG. I can see them eventually getting around a six-seven seed and the big ten getting six teams in.

Add comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • You may quote other posts using [quote] tags.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options